Bentham formalized the age-old appeals to utility, but Mill's objection echoed a dissenting note, asserting that the pursuit of happiness should not merely be a quantitative calculus but a qualitative consideration, challenging the foundations of utilitarian thought.
In ethical philosophy, Jeremy Bentham quantified happiness through the felicific calculus, providing a structured approach to evaluating actions based on pleasure and pain. This utilitarian framework aimed to maximize pleasure and minimize pain, introducing a quantitative lens to ethical decision-making.
Explore More About Traditional Appeals To Utility
John Stuart Mill, however, injected nuance into this paradigm by asserting the qualitative distinctions between higher and lower pleasures. While recognizing the significance of utility, Mill's objection challenged the reductionist nature of Bentham's approach, emphasizing the need to consider the qualitative richness of happiness in ethical evaluations. The clash between these perspectives underscores the timeless complexity of pursuing happiness and the ongoing interplay between quantitative and qualitative considerations in ethical philosophy.
Introduction
This assignment delves into an in-depth exploration of various facets of utilitarianism, with a focus on the prominent philosophical contributions of Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill. At its core, utilitarianism revolves around utility, wherein actions are deemed morally right if they contribute to happiness and pleasure rather than sorrow or pain. However, utilitarianism encompasses diverse theories, each offering unique insights and rationales from different philosophers. Consequently, this essay undertakes a critical and comprehensive examination of the perspectives of these philosophers concerning utility, encompassing its applications in the realms of politics, economics, and society.
In the following discussion, we will delve into the multifaceted theories and ideas put forth by philosophers, dissecting their interpretations of utility and how it manifests in various aspects of life, including the political, economic, and social dimensions. This exploration will offer a nuanced understanding of the profound impact utilitarianism has had on shaping ethical and moral frameworks across these domains.
Discussion
Discussion in this assignment will provide a thorough exploration of the philosophical perspectives of Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill on utility and how their ideas have influenced the realms of politics, economics, and society. It will shed light on the diverse interpretations of utilitarianism and its real-world applications, offering a holistic view of this consequential ethical framework.
Concept of Utilitarianism
Utilitarianism, as a philosophical viewpoint, guides how individuals should assess a wide array of elements, ranging from moral codes, actions, policies, and laws to character traits that they encounter in life. It falls under the category of consequentialism, emphasizing that the consequences of one's actions are the primary factors in determining the morality of those actions. Essentially, it hinges on the idea that the resulting outcomes determine an action's ethical standing. In this context, utilitarianism primarily aligns with consequentialist ethical theories, advocating for actions that contribute to the overall well-being and happiness of individuals.
Moreover, utilitarianism is intertwined with morality, serving as a framework to distinguish between right and wrong actions, policies, and characteristics. It assesses the duality of a situation, dissecting what is considered correct and incorrect. It's essential to note that determining the moral standing of a particular action relies on assessing its correctness, irrespective of the eventual consequences. Given the diversity of human behaviour and perspectives, the perception of right and wrong can vary from person to person. In its essence, utilitarianism offers a straightforward principle: prioritize actions and choices that yield the most favourable consequences for humanity.
Bentham's Traditional Appeals To Utility
Jeremy Bentham, a celebrated English philosopher and political activist, is renowned for his moral philosophy, particularly utilitarianism. This philosophical framework focuses on evaluating actions based on their consequences. Bentham is regarded as the preeminent philosopher and exponent of utilitarianism in the philosophical world. Within the theory of utilitarianism, Bentham posits that the relevant consequences of actions are those that generate overall happiness for all. This foundational principle, known as the "greatest happiness principle," was influenced by the ideas of David Hume, the Scottish philosopher. Bentham's Principle of Utility is a pivotal aspect of his philosophy, disapproving of any action, policy, trait, or regulation that diminishes or enhances an individual's happiness.
Bentham's philosophy is rooted in the hedonistic account of value and motivation, focusing on what actions are considered valuable and what motivates individuals. According to Bentham's perspective, happiness is a matter of experiencing abundant pleasure and minimal pain. Moreover, Bentham's philosophy extends to the realm of politics, asserting that different political groups and their policies have the potential to impact the well-being of a significant portion of the population. He emphasized that governments and authorities must carefully consider and assess every policy and code of conduct before implementation to ensure that they have the potential to maximize happiness and comfort for the people.
Bentham also underscores the relationship between utilitarianism and liberty, asserting that liberty is a prerequisite for achieving the highest happiness levels. Liberty, in this context, pertains to freedom from oppressive social or cultural norms and includes autonomy, control, and freedom from external constraints. Bentham's utilitarian philosophy revolves around the calculation and measurement of happiness and pain as determinants of people's well-being.
In his advocacy for liberty, Bentham took a strong stance against slavery and emphasized the utilitarian benefits of ending it. He argued that productivity and efficiency significantly increased when individuals were not subjected to slavery, as they had the freedom to perform tasks autonomously and think creatively.
Furthermore, Bentham is regarded as a pioneer in relating security to governmental power and legislative law. He highlighted that legislatures should act in ways that benefit and contribute to the people's happiness rather than imposing laws and policies through force. Bentham also ventured into advocating for women's rights, firmly opposing the subjugation of women in various cultures and nations. His introduction to the principles of legislation and morals criticized the cultural norms and societal attitudes that relegated women to inferior roles, aiming to promote women's rights and political emancipation. Bentham's advocacy for feminism aimed to eliminate gender discrimination and promote liberty for all members of society, challenging the oppressive cultural values and beliefs that have historically subjugated women.
In summary, Jeremy Bentham's philosophy underscores the quantification of happiness in various contexts. He highlights the significance of abundant happiness and its correlation with the overall well-being of individuals, making a profound impact on the fields of ethics, politics, and human rights.
John Stuart Mill's Theory and Objection
John Stuart Mill, often called J.S. Mill, is a significant figure in 19th-century British philosophy, civil service, and political economy. He made substantial contributions to the concepts of utilitarianism and classical liberalism through his diverse array of theories and philosophies. Mill's objective in introducing the philosophy of utilitarianism was to establish a moral foundation and a principle that simplifies the determination of right and wrong actions. In utilitarianism, Mill posited that actions could be considered right if they result in happiness for individuals or groups, while actions that bring sorrow are deemed wrong. Mill places a strong emphasis on the consequences and outcomes of actions, prioritizing them over ethical sentiments.
Mill's proposition theory of utilitarianism, however, diverged from Bentham's perspective. Unlike Bentham's approach of balancing pleasure and pain, Mill distinguished pleasure into two categories: higher and lower pleasures. Higher pleasures are associated with mental well-being and happiness, while lower pleasures pertain to physical gratification. Mill asserted that quantitatively measuring pleasure is a challenging endeavour. He objected to Bentham's position, contending that the theory of well-being presented by Bentham was overly simplistic. Bentham's psychological hedonism held that pleasure and pain are the sole measures of human well-being, and he believed that things can only be intrinsically good if they are desired by people, emphasizing that pleasure differs only in terms of quantity.
Mill's objection was rooted in the belief that different individuals find various pleasures more valuable than others. He argued that pleasure and pain are not the exclusive components determining human well-being, as each person's sources and measures of happiness and pleasure can be unique. While Bentham adhered to the quantitative hedonistic approach, Mill introduced qualitative hedonism, aiming to evaluate happiness and pleasure based on their quality.
In alignment with Bentham, Mill also promoted the philosophy of liberty, asserting that individuals should have equal rights and freedom to act as they see fit, provided their actions do not harm others. He contended that no one should interfere with or coerce another individual's actions unless those actions inflict harm on someone else or compromise the well-being of the environment. Mill's philosophy of liberty aligns with the principles of various liberal democracies, championing individualism and freedom.
In his discourse on women's rights, Mill argued that the emancipation of women in society could yield two significant benefits. First, it would be advantageous for society as a whole, as granting women equal rights and opportunities would enable their contributions in various fields. Second, affording women autonomy and freedom, rather than oppressing them, would be a source of happiness. Mill is often regarded as a liberal feminist because he advocates for women's equal rights. As a member of parliament and a civil servant, he emphasized that every individual, regardless of gender, should have the right to vote and participate in societal matters.
Conclusion
In summary, this essay brings to a close the comprehensive exploration and analysis of various dimensions of utilitarian philosophy, encompassing the theories and viewpoints of different philosophers on topics such as pleasure, happiness, actions, politics, liberty, and feminism. Throughout this essay, we have critically assessed the utilitarian philosophies put forth by Bentham and Mill, highlighting their areas of support and contention. Philosophies represent individuals' beliefs, ideas, rationales, and justifications about specific phenomena, and they can naturally diverge due to varying perspectives and cognitive approaches. Consequently, the existence of disparities and contradictions between the philosophies of Bentham and Mill concerning utilitarianism is an inherent and ongoing feature, as both can be deemed valid in their own right.
References
Anderson, E.S., 1991. John Stuart Mill and experiments in living. Ethics, 102(1), pp.4-26.
Ball, T., 1980. Utilitarianism, feminism, and the franchise: James Mill and his critics. History of Political Thought, 1(1), pp.91-115.
Barrow, R., 2015. Utilitarianism: A contemporary statement. Routledge.
Barrow, R., 2015. Utilitarianism: A contemporary statement. Routledge.
Braun, C.R., 2010. " On Liberty"'s Liberty. The Independent Review, 14(4), pp.599-612.
Brunon-Ernst, A., 2015. Utilitarian biopolitics: Bentham, foucault and modern power. Routledge.
Burgess-Jackson, K., 1995. John Stuart Mill, Radical Feminist. Social Theory and Practice, 21(3), pp.369-396.
Bykvist, K., 2009. Utilitarianism: A guide for the perplexed. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Capaldi, N., 2004. John Stuart Mill: A Biography. Cambridge University Press.
Driver, J., 2009. The history of utilitarianism.
Ebenstein, L.O., 2018. Routledge Revivals: The Greatest Happiness Principle (1986): An Examination of Utilitarianism. Routledge.
Gray, J., 2008. On liberty and other essays.
Harrison, R., 2010. Bentham-Arg Philosophers. Routledge.
Hart, H.L.A., 2017. Natural Rights: Bentham and John Stuart Mill. In Theories of Rights (pp. 163-188). Routledge.
Haworth, A., 2011. Understanding the political philosophers: From ancient to modern times. Routledge.
Hayry, M., 2013. Liberal utilitarianism and applied ethics. Routledge.
Hoag, R.W., 1986. Happiness and freedom: recent work on John Stuart Mill. Philosophy & public affairs, pp.188-199.
Kim, J., 2018. Philosophy of mind. Routledge.
Knowles, D., 2006. Political philosophy. Routledge.
Mill, J.S. and Leavis, F.R., 1962. On Bentham & Coleridge. Harper & Row.
Mill, J.S., 2004. On liberty and utilitarianism. WORDSWORTH EDITIONS.
Mill, J.S., 2008. Utilitarianism and liberty: Including Mill's' Essay on Bentham ' and selections from the writings of Jeremy Bentham and John Austin. John Wiley & Sons.
Mill, J.S., 2010. The basic writings of John Stuart Mill: On Liberty, the Subjection of Women and Utilitarianism. Modern Library.
Mill, J.S., 2016. Utilitarianism. In Seven Masterpieces of Philosophy (pp. 337-383). Routledge.
Nussbaum, M.C., 2011. Perfectionist liberalism and political liberalism. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 39(1), pp.3-45.
Nussbaum, M.C., 2011. Perfectionist liberalism and political liberalism. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 39(1), pp.3-45.
Pateman, C. and Grosz, E., 2013. Feminist challenges: Social and political theory. Routledge.
Perry, J., Bratman, M. and Fischer, J.M. eds., 2013. Introduction to philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Postema, G., 2006. Bentham’s utilitarianism. Utilitarianism, p.26.
Rosen, F., 2005. Classical utilitarianism from Hume to Mill. Routledge.
Shanley, M.L., 1981. II. Marital Slavery and Friendship: John Stuart Mill's The Subjection of Women. Political Theory, 9(2), pp.229-247.
Stove, D., 1993. The Subjection of John Stuart Mill. Philosophy, 68(263), pp.5-13.
Stuart, M.J., 1869. The Subjection of Women. London.
West, H. ed., 2008. The Blackwell guide to Mill's utilitarianism. John Wiley & Sons.
Get 3+ Free Dissertation Topics within 24 hours?
