Exploring the Interconnection Between Built Environment and Construction
December 19, 2020
Exploring the Significance of Change Management in Construction Projects
December 19, 2020
Civil engineering, a discipline that profoundly influences the physical environment, stands at the vanguard of a profound shift toward sustainability. No longer confined to the erstwhile goals of mere functionality and economic viability, the contemporary civil engineer's mission encompasses a far broader spectrum. In the wake of pressing issues such as climate change, dwindling resources, and environmental apprehensions, sustainability has surged to the forefront of the civil engineering profession.
Explore More About Civil Engineering
This blog takes a comprehensive look at the paramount significance of sustainability within civil engineering. It delves into the inventive methodologies and cutting-edge technologies that are propelling this pivotal transformation, addressing the challenges posed by climate change, resource depletion, and environmental considerations.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR EXAM INVIGILATORS:
This is the sole document permitted for students to bring into the exam. Please adhere to the following guidelines:
The document should not exceed 49 pages, allocating 3 pages for each of the 16 questions.
It must provide answers to all 16 questions.
Each answer should follow a consistent format, including subsections for Evidence, References to external sources, References to your Supplementary Evidence, a Summary of achievement, and Reflection on progress.
The format for each question should be uniform.
The students are prohibited from bringing any external printed materials, with the exception of acceptable diagrams.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR STUDENTS:
You must utilize this template when preparing your work, as any deviations will result in your work not being allowed during the exam.
| YOUR NAME: | MATRICULATION NUMBER: |
The following is a template to use when completing the development objectives. You need to write your text in each place where it says “Add content here”.
ASSESSMENT/AUDIT
Assessment and audit processes play a vital role in evaluating the performance, compliance, and effectiveness of various endeavours, ranging from businesses to public policies and environmental practices. These systematic examinations are essential for gathering data, identifying strengths and weaknesses, and driving informed decision-making. The following are the steps included in the assessment:
1- Understanding of Why it is Important to Measure Sustainability and the Associated Problems and Conflicts of Different Indicator Sets and Types
Understanding why it is important to measure sustainability is pivotal in today's world, where environmental, social, and economic challenges are ever-present. Sustainability measurement serves as a compass, guiding businesses, governments, and organizations towards responsible practices and long-term well-being. It provides clarity on progress, helping in the identification of areas that require improvement, and in ensuring that resources are managed conscientiously.
Evidence
The earth can no longer withstand the current human activity regarding industrial processes and production flows (Jowitt, 2013). Since Agenda 21 was formulated in Rio in 1992, the international society has focused more on pursuing and developing sustainability (Plessis, 2002). It has become clear that Sustainability positively impacts public health and the environment, reduces operating and maintenance costs and helps build a sustainable community (Wallhagen et al., 2013). The deceleration clearly stated, "Human beings are at the centre of the concern for sustainable development". That explains why sustainable development debates mainly focus on Human life (Plessis, 2002), where sustainable development matters to help and ensure long-term social, environmental, ecological, and economic growth (Ding, 2007).
Sustainability is not a goal by itself, but it is the focus point of maintaining the balance between quality of life without harming global resources nor compromising the future generation advantage (Plessis, 2002). Therefore, it is very important to measure sustainability and the associated problems as it outlines the trade-off between the social, economic, and environmental aspects (Olsson et al., 2004)
Sustainability indicators are commonly used and accepted worldwide (Olsson et al., 2004). Sustainability indicators are quantities tools that examine variations (Olsson et al., 2004). A huge number of indicators and methods have been created over the last two decades which are based on ecology, economics, politics, culture, education, air quality, environmental sustainability index, energy index, material selection, etc. (UNECE et al., 2013) however, the lacking between economic, environmental, and social aspects in practice opens too much debate (Olsson et al., 2004).
From the reviewed literature, I observed that there are many tools and methods to design and populate sustainability indicators, as also suggested by Olsson et al., 2004. UNECE et al., 2013 claimed that there are two methodologies to build a sustainability indicator; the first is based on the measurement system and the second primarily on conceptual and analytical thinking, while the differences between the approaches remain large. For instance, the GDP Indicators may help to indicate the negative or positive trend of the current human well-being. Still, on the other hand, it does not consider the linkages between the other different sustainable developments. The careful selection between quantitative and qualitative indicators depends mainly on the stakeholders.
The appropriate selection of indicators remains very country-specific or may even be viewed differently across regions within the same country (Olsson et al., 2004); therefore, it has been noticed that the sustainability development indicators literature is full of debates between different approaches and studies. Any indicator set must reflect adaptability to changing sustainability dynamics and be flexible enough to depict proven results. There should be an evaluation of the measurement criteria addressed by a certain indicator set, and the indicator type that can provide significant results should then be adopted. The EU measurement system provides a comprehensive explanation of the different tools, along with the pros and cons of each. The idea is to find the best assessment that is both reliable and measurable, providing the best fit for your measurement criteria. Monitoring the measurement system will also positively impact the indicator performance, facilitating the designing of the strategy and objectives for evaluating sustainability; therefore, periodic monitoring and evaluation of the measurement system is also recommended.
References to External Sources
Chrisna du Plessis, 2002, Agenda 21 for Sustainable Construction in Developing Countries - A discussion document. ISBN 0-7988-5540-1.
Grace K C Ding, 2007, Sustainable Construction – The Role of Environmental Assessment Tools, 2007, Australia.
Johanna Alkan Olsson, Tuija Hilding-Rydevik, Hallgeir Aalbu and Karin Bradley, 2004, Indicators for Sustainable Development, European Regional Network on Sustainable Development, Cardiff, March 2004.
Paul W. Jowitt, 2004, Sustainable Development and The Formation of The Civil Engineer, ICE Engineering Sustainability Volume 157 Issue 2.
UNECE/Eurostat/OECD, 2013, Task Force on Measuring Sustainable Development, Framework and suggested indicators to measure sustainable development, May 2013.
References to Your Supplementary Evidence
Wayne, B., and Trusty, M.A., (2007). Integrating LCA Tools in Green Building Rating Systems. Sustainable Materials Conference, Vancouver.
Marita Wallhagen, Mauritz Glaumann and Ulla Westerberg, 2008, What Is A “Green” Building According to Different Assessment Tools.
Summary of Achievement
The evidence above shows that I understand the relationship between environmental concerns and economic and social development, including why it is important to measure sustainability. Further appreciating how sustainable development requires focus on the real value of sustainability and understanding the current efforts to develop further knowledge on the various dimensions of sustainability such as ethical, economic, cultural aspects, etc.
I learned that there is no generally accepted procedure to measure all sustainability aspects, along with the importance of prioritizing the selection of real indicators with subjective weightings. The subjective weighting approach can reflect the actual region variations and criteria; however, the social and cultural boundaries are difficult to define.
Reflection on Progress
I look forward to continuing to read about the new methodologies of measuring sustainability and how debates resulting in more questions than answers can be addressed. Although I have achieved awareness of much of the objective in this course, my knowledge is still limited to the shell of the subject, and I need to go deeper to continue my understanding in this area.
2- Knowledge of How Sustainability in the Built Environment is Measured Locally by You
Measuring sustainability in the built environment locally involves a multifaceted approach. It begins with assessing factors such as energy efficiency, water conservation, waste management, and the use of sustainable materials in construction and maintenance. This measurement often includes local building codes and regulations that promote green building practices.
Evidence
In the UK and other European places, the government plays a pivotal role in ensuring sustainability in various dimensions of life, including sustainability of knowledge, landscapes, buildings, food and energy, economic factors and environmental aspects, local areas, industrial processes, society development and related sectors (Smart Cities, 2015). Sustainability from an environmental perspective is given prime importance, and committees have been formulated to draft, measure and analyze the impact of sustainability objectives. UK organizations, especially the construction industry, have widely adopted the use of environmental management models and planning systems to ensure their processes conform to predefined sustainability criteria.
The government institutes and sustainability development committees have established construction standards and guidelines that organizations must follow to ensure their practices conform to such laws to achieve global sustainability issues and concerns. UK organisations have implemented these quality standards and used management systems that measure process performance with numerous well-defined indicators. The sustainability and built environment can also be measured through the developed indicators for particular requirements by local bodies such as the Audit Commission, ODPM, the Sustainable Development Commission, and DEFRA. Such practices also involve using quality construction material that allows for the conservation of natural resources and optimising processes that result in minimal waste and pollutants omission (the UK government has also set/targeted a deadline for such emissions).
Organizations have also adopted measures like ETI for construction projects and implementing quality standards like the ISO 4001. Construction projects ensure that sustainable considerations and responsibilities are part of each development endeavour phase, including planning, design and execution phases to promote environment-friendly practices. Many organizations, especially in the construction sector, have adopted measures that increase the positive environmental impact and help conserve energy and natural resources to reduce carbon dioxide emissions and waste production. Such practices make use of recycled construction material and the use of energy-conserving alternatives like portable solar technologies. All these practices help to encourage sustainability development efforts and facilitate the addressing of environmental concerns at a global level.
References to External Sources
Blackstone, Rupert. 2013, How do we achieve a sustainable lifestyle? Available from: <https://www.imeche.org/knowledge/industries/energy-environment-and-sustainability/news/Sustainable-Lifestyles>. [19 November 2015].
7786 - Supporting planning processes connected with built environment sustainable development, Smart cities 2015. Available from: <https://eu-smartcities.eu/commitment/7786>. [19 November 2015].
Miyazawa, I (2012). What are sustainable development goals? Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES) Rio +20 issue brief] Roux, P. & Alexander, A. (2007). Sustainable Building Materials
References to Your Supplementary Evidence
EIA Project_IDL_H00142885_Ahmed Heiba.docx
CCC, (2010). The Fourth Carbon Budget: Reducing emissions through the 2020s. The Committee on Climate Change, London
Environment Agency and Countryside Agency (2005) Green Infrastructure and Sustainable Communities. Environment Agency and Countryside Agency
Summary of Achievement
The research on this objective helped refine my knowledge and augmented my information base regarding the practices and policies relative to sustainability initiatives in the UK and other European places. This is also reflected in my work on the ETA project, for which I carried out a critical evaluation.
Reflection on Progress
The knowledge and practical experience I gained will benefit my future endeavours as a civil engineer. I also need to study more about UK government plans and policies to ensure sustainability in various domains and how these are currently being applied in the industry.
3- Critical Interpretation of the Results of Simple Best Practicable Environmental Option and Footprint Analyses
A critical interpretation of the results of Simple Best Practicable Environmental Option (BPEO) and footprint analyses is essential for informed decision-making in sustainability and environmental management.
The BPEO analysis aims to identify the most environmentally responsible and cost-effective solution for a specific process or activity. When interpreting BPEO results, it's crucial to consider the broader context and the potential trade-offs involved. What may be the best option in one aspect may have negative consequences in another, so a holistic perspective is necessary.
Evidence
Market-based approaches, such as simple footprint analysis methods, are popular and easy to use. The approach assesses building performance across a wider range of environmental characteristics using incentives to achieve higher environmental standards. Sustainability aspects are comprehensive and complex, and they are not easy to measure using conventional methods as these consider the environmental issue as a single dimension and, therefore, are not adequate methods to assess the overall sustainability development (Ding, 2007).
Enhancing the quality of life of people cannot degrade the environmental aspect, but it should be perceived in its wider view regarding social and economic impact (Olsson et al., 2004). The environmental building assessment method typically cannot assess socio-economic sustainability (Ding, 2007). For instance, some footprint assessment tools such as ecological footprints (EFs), Carbon Footprint analyses, DPEO and LCA, along with certification schemes such as BREEAM, BEPAC and LEED, can be used to determine and assess the best environmental objectives; however, they may not include financial appraisal in their structure (Ding, 2007), but the sustainability index includes social and economic concerns in additional to the environmental aspects of sustainability.
Therefore, using these assessment tools alone is insufficient, and hence, a comprehensive assessment method is required to provide in-depth and careful evaluation. The accurate assessment tools of the environment require a more complex context for them to be effective. (Reijnders & Roekel, 1999) stated that using the pre-designed environmental criteria effectively without geographical databases is doubtful. From the literature reviewed in this research, it was observed that to obtain simple best practicable environmental options along with footprint analyses, various tools are needed to be utilized along with other computer-aided systems such as BIM, as these can present various sustainable options at the design stage of the projects which can be compared to select the most suitable one. From the literature reviewed, it was noticed that to enhance further the operational practices from the prospective practitioners of the industry, integration of systems such as LCA and BIM into one large system is essential; however, this is yet to be accomplished.
References to External Sources
Grace K C Ding, 2007, Sustainable Construction – The Role of Environmental Assessment Tools, 2007, Australia.
Johanna Alkan Olsson, Tuija Hilding-Rydevik, Hallgeir Aalbu and Karin Bradley, 2004, Indicators for Sustainable Development, European Regional Network on Sustainable Development, Cardiff, March 2004.
Land Reijnders and A. van Roekel, 1999. Comprehensiveness and adequacy of tools for the environmental improvement of buildings.
Jrade A. and Jalaei F. (2013). Integrating building information modelling with sustainability to design building projects at the conceptual stage, Journal of Building Simulation, Springer.
References to Your Supplementary Evidence
EIA Project_IDL_H00142885_Ahmed Heiba.docx
He, X., and Zhang, K. (2011). Multidisciplinary approaches to new pathways to sustainable development. Environment and development, 1(1), 1-7.
Ya Roderick, David McEwan, Craig Wheatley, Carlos Alonso, 2012, A comparative study of building energy performance assessment between LEED, BREEAM and Green Star schemes.
Summary of Achievement
The evidence above shows that I now understand the limitations and inadequacies of using a conventional single-dimension environmental assessment tool and its impact on decision-making. There is a strong need for the use of a comprehensive model to provide in-depth building performance against integrated sustainability aspects.
Reflection on Progress
I now have a wider understanding of environmental assessment tools; however, I could improve this understanding by exposing myself to new research and journals on footprint analysis frameworks.
4- Comparison of Different Life-Cycle Assessment Tools
Comparing different Life-Cycle Assessment (LCA) tools is a crucial step in choosing the most appropriate methodology for evaluating the environmental impact of products, processes, or systems. When conducting this comparison, it's important to consider various factors such as scope, data requirements, and the intended use of the LCA results.
Evidence
Life-cycle assessment (LCA) tools are designed to evaluate industrial procedures' environmental impact and measure the feasibility and sustainability of buildings and green sites. The methodology uses the product life cycle, analyzing the inputs and outputs at each stage from the design, production, delivery, utility, reusability, recycling and disposal. The various environmental factors that the LCA considers are inventory analyses regarding ecological or ecosystem variables, health and production output effects on the environment to optimize processes and ensure compliance with environment-friendly practices and standards. Different tools and processing methodologies will result in varied results as each has its strengths and weaknesses, and it depends on the LCA practitioner to use the most optimized tool to measure environmental impact. Some examples of such tools include the ENVEST, BREEAM, Smart waste and CEEQUAL tools, with fundamental framework analyses including lifecycle sway evaluation LCIA, life-cycle analyses, LCI investigation along with elucidation (Otiz et al., 2009)
As discussed, various tools will produce different results as each assessment tool has strengths and weaknesses. The evaluation of my A470 project through the CEEQUAL tool has provided further information on the key strengths of this tool and areas of improvement. The idea is to use the most optimized tool for measuring sustainability, and often, the selection of the particular tool will depend on the assessment practitioner's perspective and measurement criteria. From the literature reviewed, it was observed that the CEEQUAL tool is probably one of the most reliable and comprehensive assessment tools that provides reliable data that can be used effectively to assess sustainability feasibility. Compared to other LCA tools, it was found to be a more stable and strong evaluation scheme that produced accurate information that project owners could use to improve their building's sustainability ratings and help achieve development objectives in conformity with defined policies and legislation.
References to External Sources
Comparison of Best Life Cycle Assessment Software, Link City 2015. Available from: <http://www.linkcycle.com/comparison-of-best-life-cycle-assessment-software/>.Accessed [19 November 2015].
Comparison of energy-based indicators used in building life cycle assessment tools, Science Direct 2014. Available from: <http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360132314001425/>.Accessed [19 November 2015].
Planning and Project Management, Chuthamat's Space 2015. Available from: <http://chuthamatc.blogspot.com/2011/10/objective-16-planning-and-project.html/>.Accessed [19 November 2015].
Kubba S. (2012). Handbook of Green Building Design and Construction: LEED, BREEAM, and Green Globes. UK: Butterworth Heinemann.
Ortiz, O., Castellsa, F. and Sonnemann, G. (2009) Sustainability in the construction industry: A review of recent developments based on LCA, Construction and Building Materials, 23(1), pp. 28-39.
References to Your Supplementary Evidence
(CEEQUAL_PreAssessment_WPA_Int_Scoresheet_Adapted_by_HWU_IDL_H00142885_Ahmed Heiba.xlsx)
Comments and Evaluation of CEEQUAL_IDL_H00142885_Ahmed Heiba
Summary of Achievement
The research for this objective and my study on the CEEQUAL and LCA tools have refined my knowledge and practical know-how of tools and models adopted by various companies to measure building sustainability. This will further facilitate me when I evaluate construction projects in my career and use environment-friendly best practices in the construction industry.
Reflection on Progress
I plan to study various analytical tools and measurement models catering to the built environments to develop an in-depth understanding of this objective further to facilitate my career. Various LCA processing techniques that practitioners currently use require extensive analyses regarding their productivity and impact. Hence, a detailed study is needed to understand the SOPs of LCA and related tools.
5- Comparison of the Application of Different International Building Assessment Tools to a Case Study
Comparing the application of various international building assessment tools to a specific case study is a valuable exercise in the realm of sustainable construction and design. Each tool, such as LEED, BREEAM, or GreenStar, comes with its own set of criteria and rating systems that assess a building's environmental and performance attributes.
Evidence
Building assessment tools are quickly developing in many regions and are widely accepted as measurement tools for the sustainability of buildings. The studies show that Design performance and sustainability ratings are reliant on the scheme used; for example, an office building got a high rating score based on the Green Star scheme but a low score based on BREEAM, and it was unsuccessful based on its evaluation when certified with the LEED scheme (Roderick et al., 2012), it has been concluded that this wide difference is due to the three schemes having different energy assessment methods and performance criteria.
Wallhagen et al., 2013 developed a similar study comparing different schemes, namely EcoEffect, LEED and Code for Sustainable Homes (CSH), on a new multi-storey residential building. It has been observed that weighting plays a major role in building assessment schemes; for instance, the LEED scheme is very much focused on reuse and recycling, while EcoEffect focuses on hazardous substances (Wallhagen et al., 2013). However, the literature resources discuss various issues on the weights of different environmental aspects, and there is no definitive agreement on the concept of green buildings.
Therefore, the evidence based on the literature reviewed suggests that although different assessment tools can produce different results for any particular case study, the objective of all such tools is to enhance the productivity and sustainability of the built environment. Hence, a particular tool can be used to assess the building, following its particular sets of standards for rating and assessments.
References to External Sources
Ya Roderick, David McEwan, Craig Wheatley, Carlos Alonso, 2012, A comparative study of building energy performance assessment between LEED, BREEAM and Green Star schemes.
Marita Wallhagen, Mauritz Glaumann and Ulla Westerberg, 2008, What Is A “Green” Building According to Different Assessment Tools.
Indicators of Sustainable development - key indicators United Nations UN 2015. Available from:<https://www.google.com.pk/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/natlinfo/indicators/guidelines.pdf/>.Accessed [23 November 2015].
References to Your Supplementary Evidence
(CEEQUAL_PreAssessment_WPA_Int_Scoresheet_Adapted_by_HWU_IDL_H00142885_Ahmed Heiba.xlsx)
Comments and Evaluation of CEEQUAL_IDL_H00142885_Ahmed Heiba
Summary of Achievement
The evidence above shows a good understanding of different directions and characteristics regarding “green” building assessment tools that have been developed in terms of aim, content and aggregation. This helped me to improve further my overall judgement that one tool is not always perfect for reducing environmental impacts, and there will be marginal differences between the ranking results based on different schemes as there is definitive agreement on the core weighing system or foundational criteria which is the crux of these assessment tools.
Reflection on Progress
I have explored the subject, but in-depth understanding will require me to investigate the interaction between different bodies of knowledge. The practical assessment, evaluation and research on indicator sets will benefit me in my future endeavours and professional initiatives. I now have a deeper understanding of the effective framework for measuring sustainability in development endeavours. I need to gain a further operational understanding of the various assessment sets available along with their feasibility analysis, for which I would require further research and studies. I believe this is important as it would enhance my skill set and professional prowess to deliver the best and enable me to use best practices that ensure sustainable development.
6- Understanding of Your Professional Responsibilities about Sustainability and the Code of Conduct of Your Profession
Understanding your professional responsibilities regarding sustainability is fundamental for individuals across various fields. Professionals have an ethical obligation to consider and integrate sustainable practices into their work, acknowledging the long-term impact of their decisions on the environment, society, and the economy.
Evidence
Originally, the economic side of projects was the main driver of a project's success, such as with canal and railway buildings and less attention was typically given to the environment. Another key factor was the lack of media coverage of drivers impacting the environment. Environmental factors such as pollution were recognised at the start of the 20th century (Transport Issues, 2006). The public inquiry was the main reason environmental concerns have been recognized. In the UK, the Buchanan report pinpointed the environmental impact of construction projects. The transport sector in the 1980s was mostly either privatized or deregulated, and many road projects had been cancelled. Environmental pressure groups such as Greenpeace and Friends of the Earth were formed and largely contributed to putting pressure on large-scale projects. In the 1990s, governmental entities were becoming aware of the environmental issues. They had published promoting greener transportation methods, emphasising the importance of using public transport or bikes instead of personally owned cars. In 1992, the Rio Earth Summit resulted in the Agenda 21 legislation, which emphasizes engineers taking account of environmental issues from planning throughout design to final execution of a project.
The construction sector is viewed as having a critical impact on the environment as it accounts for the important use of resources and waste emissions through an activities chain that starts upstream with the extraction of raw materials, going through to processing, fabrication and building large blocks, etc. It is also viewed as one of the largest polluters of the environment by industry.
To mitigate potential risks that would affect “Our Common Future” (definition by the Brutland Commission), the construction industry should use the sustainability agenda and practices to reduce its negative environmental impacts. While driving economic success, the construction industry should also achieve sustainable practices and undertake initiatives that positively impact the environment.
As we move forward, sustainability and environmentally friendly solutions are more critical in being implemented by the civil engineering profession. It is estimated by 2025, that water withdrawals will increase by 50% in emerging countries and 18% in developed countries (Ernest & Young, 2015). Natural resources should, therefore, be effectively managed and protected. This can be accomplished by adopting sustainable construction methods and best practices, including legislation, codes of conduct and best practices. A professional / practitioner must assess the activity in process and analyze how it can be completed, considering the least impact it may generate on the environment. For example, at the time of the building designs, consideration must be given to the provision of daylight utilization, natural ventilation, use of sustainable and recyclable materials and optimized waste management methods.
References to External Sources
Ernest& Young, 2015, Megatrends 2015 - Making sense of a world in motion.
Marita Wallhagen, Mauritz Glaumann and Ulla Westerberg, 2008, What Is A “Green” Building According to Different Assessment Tools.
Paul W. Jowitt, 2004, Sustainable Development and The Formation of The Civil Engineer, ICE Engineering Sustainability Volume 157 Issue 2.
Grace K C Ding, 2007, Sustainable Construction – The Role of Environmental Assessment Tools, 2007, Australia.
References to Your Supplementary Evidence
(CEEQUAL_PreAssessment_WPA_Int_Scoresheet_Adapted_by_HWU_IDL_H00142885_Ahmed Heiba.xlsx)
Comments and Evaluation of CEEQUAL_IDL_H00142885_Ahmed Heiba
Summary of Achievement
Based on the evidence cited above, it can be ascertained that I now have a complete realization and understanding of responsibilities and the code of conduct expected of a person in the civil engineering profession. The extensive study and practical endeavours undertaken by me for the awareness and achievement of this objective have provided me with the required knowledge regarding environmentally friendly practices and sustainability measures while designing, constructing, operating and maintaining buildings or green sites. I plan to utilize this knowledge and understanding to enhance further my core abilities relative to the civil engineering profession.
Reflection on Progress
The study and research to achieve this objective have further refined my information base, facilitating my work in this profession. I need to gather a much deeper awareness regarding implementing best practices that cater to sustainability in the construction industry and overall environment, for which I would need to undertake further research and practical initiatives.
7- A Detailed Understanding of Practical Details and Examples of How Your Profession Could Impact Sustainability Issues
A comprehensive understanding of the practical details and examples of how your profession can impact sustainability issues is essential in today's world. Professionals across diverse fields, whether in engineering, healthcare, finance, or education, play a significant role in shaping sustainability outcomes.
Evidence
As the construction sector is an important contributor to the economy, even small practices that lead to efficiencies during a development project's construction and operational life will have an important positive impact on the economy and the environment.
The development of engineering practices and the new technologies that are used in this sector assist in finding solutions to environmental issues within the context of the building industry. It is, for instance, worth mentioning that water scarcity in the Middle East is one major issue causing conflicts between countries and people endeavouring to gain access to water. Consequently, it is detrimental to address the issues related to water resources through a basic role played by civil engineers setting sustainable water strategies encompassing the technical side.
Global Megatrends that will be shaping our environment in the next decades include lifestyle issues, technologies and economic growth, which is the area in which civil engineers would apply technology to respond to human and societal needs. Design of large irrigation and hydropower schemes focused on the economic side and not considering the environmental damage (loss of soil fertility, soil erosion, damage to the ecosystem, etc…) can no longer be viable. Civil engineers must adapt and have a more central role, benefiting society while working with natural power sources. They must approach their engineering work with a holistic view of macroeconomic, social, environmental and economic factors while reaching their engineering perspectives, which are at the heart of sustainable development.
Thinking sustainable and implementing technically viable solutions with economical designs and environmentally friendly solutions is the only way to manage population growth, climate change and the ageing Infrastructure. With environmental management, environmental planning, environmental Infrastructure, waste management solutions, green building designs, sustainable planning, and efficient technologies, sustainability concerns can be successfully addressed.
Using rammed earth walls as opposed to concrete walls, using energy from renewable solutions such as water, sun, and wind, and using locally sourced materials are examples of how the civil engineering profession can impact sustainability issues. With the latest tools enabling sustainable designs, the use of Building Information Modeling allows the analysis of heat gain, solar, ventilation, and energy efficiency through modelling airflow and ventilation and the integration of the direction and location of the sunlight, BIM providing heating and cooling advantages and long term energy cost savings (Fehrenbacher, 2011). Accurately modelling buildings and coordinating between all engineering disciplines, BIM generates cost savings in material and labour by increasing design efficiency and minimizing material waste (BIM journal, 2009).
References to External Sources
Fehrenbacher, J, 2011, ‘How Building Information Modeling (BIM) helps Buildings Go Green’, Inhabitat, 30 June 2011.
BIM Journal, 2009, BIM explained.
Paul W. Jowitt, 2004, Sustainable Development and The Formation of The Civil Engineer, ICE Engineering Sustainability Volume 157 Issue 2
Grace K C Ding, 2007, Sustainable Construction – The Role of Environmental Assessment Tools, 2007, Australia.
References to Your Supplementary Evidence
(CEEQUAL_PreAssessment_WPA_Int_Scoresheet_Adapted_by_HWU_IDL_H00142885_Ahmed Heiba.xlsx)
Comments and Evaluation of CEEQUAL_IDL_H00142885_Ahmed Heiba
Summary of Achievement
The research and evidence highlighted above reflect the initiatives undertaken on my part to enhance my knowledge base and further refine my prowess as a prospective civil engineer who can positively contribute to the environment by employing sustainability measures and valuable environment-friendly practices.
Reflection on Progress
The knowledge of how I can contribute to green sites and global sustainability objectives has been polished further through my research and work on this particular objective. I plan to use the extensive online resources available to gain insight into how my work in this domain could help address sustainability concerns across the globe.
8- Understanding of How Policies and Procedures to Manage Sustainability are Used in at Least One Organisation (e.g. Your Own Company or British Land)
Understanding how policies and procedures to manage sustainability are applied within organizations, such as British Land or your own company, is crucial in the pursuit of responsible business practices. These policies often encompass various aspects of sustainability, including environmental, social, and governance (ESG) considerations.
Evidence
For this particular evidence, I have researched the quality management system of the Michelin Company, and based on the information I received from one of its ex-employees, the details have been highlighted below for lucid understanding. The Michelin Company makes use of the ISO 14001 standard to optimize its processes to ensure conformity in terms of quality and an environment-friendly production system (Chuthamat, 2015). The primary product for this company is Tyre, which is produced using chemicals, water and rubber/elastomers as raw materials. The production process results in carbon emission and other pollutants; hence, the organization has implemented the ISO 14001 standard to refine its quality management system and to maintain its environmental management system. This ensures environment-friendly practices conforming to cost-effective sustainability objectives, helps minimize waste production, and efficiently uses natural resources.
However, it must be noted that integrating new technology must be adopted regularly. The systems installed for waste management and purification must be regularly inspected. According to the Michelin Company’s employees, the company seeks to ensure that the waste produced during the manufacturing process is maintained within the allowable limits, and therefore, the data on the waste is properly maintained/recorded, and the process is inspected periodically as per the ISO 14001 standard.
References to External Sources
Planning and Project Management, Chuthamat's Space 2015. Available from: <http://chuthamatc.blogspot.com/2011/10/objective-16-planning-and-project.html/>.Accessed [19 November 2015].
Sustainability Report 2011, British Tobacco Company 2015. Available from: <https://www.google.com.pk/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=http://www.bat.com/groupfs/sites/BAT_8NXDKN.nsf/vwPagesWebLive/C125795300362522C125785B0053A2E5/%24FILE/sustainability_and_our_business_full.pdf/>.Accessed [19 November 2015].
The sustainable economy, Harvard Business Review 2015. Available from: <https://hbr.org/2011/10/the-sustainable-economy/>.Accessed [19 November 2015].
References to Your Supplementary Evidence
(CEEQUAL_PreAssessment_WPA_Int_Scoresheet_Adapted_by_HWU_IDL_H00142885_Ahmed Heiba.xlsx)
Comments and Evaluation of CEEQUAL_IDL_H00142885_Ahmed Heiba
EIA Project_IDL_H00142885_Ahmed Heiba.docx
Summary of Achievement
Through my study for this objective, I know various practices organisations adopt to optimize their business processes. It helped me learn about industry standards and practices employed across the globe that contribute towards environment-friendly goals and sustainability endeavours.
Reflection on Progress
The experience would further facilitate my civil engineering career as I now understand organisations' sustainability practices, policies and environmental management models. I can further enhance my skill set by researching additional areas relevant to industry standards and policies.
9- Aware of How Environmental Management Systems Can Improve Sustainability
Being aware of how Environmental Management Systems (EMS) can enhance sustainability is paramount in today's environmentally conscious world. EMS frameworks, such as ISO 14001, provide a structured approach for organizations to identify, assess, and manage their environmental impacts.
Evidence
Environmental Management Systems (EMS) are specialized models, policies or frameworks that are employed by industries and organizations to minimize the environmental influence as a consequence of their business processes (Green Plus, 2015). An important international EMS standard widely adopted globally by various organizations is ISO14001, which defines the criteria companies can use through their planning, monitoring, measurement and decision-making processes to refine and maintain their environmental management system. This further facilitates organizations to formulate effective legislation and policies to encourage environment-friendly practices.
Similarly, various ISO standards and Great Britain's independent regulator for work-related health, safety and illness HSE have been implemented based on individual industrial practices, which also come under the environmental management systems. For example, there are various sets of standards when working with different forms of materials on site, typically for their disposal and implications. From the literature reviewed, it was noticed that these standards facilitate the industry's stakeholders to understand the environmental requirements of each activity and provide critical information on how to utilize the available resources best. Under the project’s environmental management systems (EMS) umbrella, each activity must be completed by the optimized standard. Hence, these standards support completing projects with a higher level of sustainability (EMS, 2015).
References to External Sources
How an Environmental Management System (EMS) helps create a sustainable business, Business Case Studies 2015. Available from:<http://businesscasestudies.co.uk/travis-perkins/how-an-environmental-management-system-ems-helps-create-a-sustainable-business/#ixzz3ryv1mOtu/>.Accessed [19 November 2015].
Environmental Management Systems-Bonus, GreenPlus 2015. Available from: <http://gogreenplus.org/nuts-and-bolts-guide/performance-nuts-and-bolts-guide/sustainability-management/bonus-environmental-management-systems/>.Accessed [19 November 2015]
References to Your Supplementary Evidence
(CEEQUAL_PreAssessment_WPA_Int_Scoresheet_Adapted_by_HWU_IDL_H00142885_Ahmed Heiba.xlsx)
Comments and Evaluation of CEEQUAL_IDL_H00142885_Ahmed Heiba
EIA Project_IDL_H00142885_Ahmed Heiba.docx
Summary of Achievement
While researching for this objective, I realized that most organizations widely adopted the use of such environmental management models to ensure their processes conform to sustainability criteria. This enhanced my understanding of why such planning systems are important and how they contribute towards a sustainable environment.
Reflection on Progress
I further plan to research case studies relevant to the use of planning systems and how organizations use such management frameworks and standards to optimize their processes to ensure conformity to sustainability objectives.
10- Familiarity With Planning Systems, e.g. Legislation, Area Plans, Procedures, Rights of Appeal, Control Systems and Responsibilities
Familiarity with planning systems, including legislation, area plans, procedures, rights of appeal, control systems, and responsibilities, is vital for individuals and organizations involved in urban and regional development. This knowledge enables stakeholders to navigate the complex web of regulations and processes governing land use and development.
Evidence
Planning systems greatly facilitate the achievement of sustainability objectives on a global level. Effective legislation and high-impact policies can be curated through planning systems, resulting in green designs and sustainable environments. Such planning systems aim at minimizing the impact of environmental flows and construction endeavours like carbon emission levels, zero landfill policy and water conservation legislation (Chuthamat, 2015). Such planning systems receive significant input from relevant stakeholders through decisions and feedback to formulate necessary legislation and policies.
A vast majority of research also impacts this legislation, area plans and procedures, rights of appeal, control systems and responsibilities, etc., as the industrial operating practices are subjected to improvement, as suggested through the development of various HSE and other legislations of local bodies which have been derived, revised and developed for the course many years (Loe, 2000).
The idea of sustainable development reflects the awareness of ensuring best practices in the design, building, operations and maintenance of sites or buildings. The entire process requires that project owners understand the value of implementing optimized procedures during planning, evaluating, designing and executing construction endeavours. The stakeholders have hence adopted control and management frameworks such as BIM for implementing such best practices. The development process is now more precisely planned and monitored to ensure conformity to sustainability objectives. The strategy also includes the local development plan and the policies formulated by international committees to promote a safer and more productive eco-friendly environment and standardized processes based on quality standards.
The stakeholders, including community members, have become more aware of their responsibility to encourage sustainable development through these frameworks. The same holds for urban designs and commercial building construction, such as public transport networks and urban infrastructure. Optimized design, well-planned layouts, optimized activity planning, and availability of these policies/frameworks provide for a higher quality of life for the community members, including convenience and comfort, which are primarily considered to be major success factors for sustainable environments and are also the main goals of sustainability development (Adil Khan, 2015).
One key example of implementing legislation, area plans, procedures, etc., in urban design is the proper layout and quality construction of roads and highways that facilitate comfortable commuting. Another example concerns properly planning and designing drainage systems and water distribution outlets that can provide security against environmental risks like floods and other consequential damages. The design should consider these factors along with proper discharge and management of relatively large volumes of water. Some of the practices undertaken by government institutes for urban designs include using recyclable material in construction and prefabrication of buildings to minimize pollutants emissions and promote the conservation of natural resources. The concept of Eco-Village also addresses sustainability concerns, further promoting environment-friendly practices (Chauthamat 2015). Further design considerations like passive solar energy, high insulation standards and the use of portable solar screens greatly facilitate the achievement of sustainability objectives. Also, using a combo of best power plants purely designed based on the biomass concept will influence sustainability by producing steamed water and zero-carbon electricity for consumers. Various construction projects in urban design have implemented these practices. These practices, therefore, must conform to local sustainability policies and measurement schemes.
References to External Sources
Khan, Adil. 2015, PLANNING FOR AND MONITORING PROJECT SUSTAINABILITY: A GUIDELINE ON CONCEPTS, ISSUES AND TOOLS. Available from: <http://www.mande.co.uk/docs/khan.html/>.Accessed [23 November 2015].
Martin Guy Sexton, 2000, Sustainable Built Environments and Construction Activity through Dynamic Research Agendas, April 2000.
Paul W. Jowitt, 2004, Sustainable Development and The Formation of The Civil Engineer, ICE Engineering Sustainability Volume 157 Issue 2
Rebecca Johansson, 2011, Evaluation of experiences from using CEEQUAL in infrastructure projects - A case study of the Crossrail programme and the Olympic Park.
Planning and Project Management, Chuthamat's Space 2015. Available from: <http://chuthamatc.blogspot.com/2011/10/objective-16-planning-and-project.html/>.Accessed [23 November 2015].
Loe, E. (2000). The Value of Architecture: Context & Current Thinking. London: RIBA Publications
References to Your Supplementary Evidence
EIA Project_IDL_H00142885_Ahmed Heiba.docx
(CEEQUAL_PreAssessment_WPA_Int_Scoresheet_Adapted_by_HWU_IDL_H00142885_Ahmed Heiba.xlsx)
Comments and Evaluation of CEEQUAL_IDL_H00142885_Ahmed Heiba
Summary of Achievement
Through my research and study to achieve this particular objective, I have gained an in-depth understanding of the significance of legislation and policies relative to ensuring sustainability in the environmental flows and green sites. As my supplementary evidence reveals, I have greatly benefitted from my evaluation of the ETA construction project and CEEQUAL evaluation, including an analysis of such legislation.
Reflection on Progress
I plan to extend my knowledge base regarding policies and legislation relative to planning systems in the construction industry through research and studies. There is a need to understand the significance of undertaking best practices that contribute to sustainable development in every community sphere at each level or echelon. Government organizations and sustainability development committees have formulated legislation and policies to ensure environment-friendly procedures. Still, it is primarily the responsibility of the population at large to implement such practices and cultivate a deeper realization of the need to promote sustainability.
11- Knowledge of Contract Systems and How They May Influence Sustainability
A thorough understanding of contract systems and their influence on sustainability is crucial for professionals in various industries. Contracts define the terms, obligations, and responsibilities of parties involved in a project or business transaction. In the context of sustainability, contracts can play a significant role in shaping environmental and ethical outcomes.
Evidence
Within the construction industry, stakeholders play a major role in sustainability development (Sexton, 2000). The stakeholders normally influence the level of sustainability importance and criteria during the feasibility stage (Ding, 2007). Sustainability development objectives are always on the periphery of understanding and behaviour of the stakeholders.
Most literature resources discuss the influence of the stakeholders on the progression and promotion of sustainability. The lack of effective coordination between the design firms, contractors, and clients is considered a barrier to developing sustainable development. However, the client plays a key role since he is primarily accountable for building the team and paying fees.
The issue of linking stakeholders (Client, investor, designer, contractor, suppliers, Operations/maintenance/ management) is one of the key points if we need to promote and encourage sustainability development. For instance, the project “A470 Lledr Valley Improvement” overall demonstrated a good Sustainability consideration feasibility featured in various aspects. Still, in my opinion, the most important factor was the establishment of good relations between the project’s partners, which would facilitate and encourage the team to succeed in areas like careful design and programming. This can be accomplished through many construction and engineering contracts (NEC). However, an important aspect is the management model and procurement systems being applied to the project. For example, suppose an NEC contract with Design and Build Systems is selected for a project. In that case, the contractor may assume the responsibility and risk of undertaking the design and conducting the project. However, suppose the sustainability aspects and overall management are prioritised. In that case, the contract type must be tailored to the management contract, where management responsibilities are shared among the project's different teams and stakeholders (Mendler and William, 2000).
References to External Sources
Martin Guy Sexton, 2000, Sustainable Built Environments and Construction Activity through Dynamic Research Agendas, April 2000.
Grace K C Ding, 2007, Sustainable Construction – The Role of Environmental Assessment Tools, 2007, Australia.
Mendler, Sandra F., and William Odell (2000) The HOK Guidebook to Sustainable Design.
References to Your Supplementary Evidence
(CEEQUAL_PreAssessment_WPA_Int_Scoresheet_Adapted_by_HWU_IDL_H00142885_Ahmed Heiba.xlsx)
Comments and Evaluation of CEEQUAL_IDL_H00142885_Ahmed Heiba
Summary of Achievement
From the above, I now understand the significance of the contract system and how it impacts the sustainability development of a project. The topic widened my view on the key role of the client in influencing sustainability and how it is linked to his priorities and objectives.
Reflection on Progress
I think this will be an important part of my future as my target is to promote initiatives linked to the stakeholder with their objectives and priorities, particularly contractual procedures, which will help promote sustainability development in projects.
12- Understand the Purpose and Processes of Strategic Environmental Assessments or Sustainability Appraisals and Environmental Impact Assessments
Understanding the purpose and processes of Strategic Environmental Assessments (SEAs), Sustainability Appraisals (SAs), and Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs) is fundamental for responsible and sustainable decision-making in various sectors. SEAs and SAs are systematic approaches that evaluate the potential environmental and social impacts of policies, plans, and programs. They ensure that sustainability considerations are integrated into strategic decision-making, helping to identify and mitigate adverse effects while promoting environmental and social goals.
Evidence
The strategic environmental assessment, also called SEA, is a system organisations adopt to ensure that sustainability parameters and environmental aspects are effectively considered at the initial stages of the drafting and designs, policies or any other framework. The literature reviewed in my research suggested that the SEA analyzes various parameters of the project and mitigates any forms of risk to the environment by ensuring that sufficient measures are being undertaken to address the concerns raised under the environmental assessments. It is one of the influential systems in place for mitigating environmental hazards in the construction industry.
Similarly, the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is considered a dynamic process that evaluates the environmental impact of a particular development/construction project. This assessment considers key variables such as economic, social, on-site safety and health, etc., and is aimed at producing standard operating practices to mitigate any risks involved in the project (He and Zhang, 2011)
When undertaking development initiatives or built environment endeavours, all stakeholders, including designers, contractors, government agencies, policy groups, sponsors and related entities, must formulate a mutual agreement that reflects a framework for facilitating sustainability efforts. In my local area, the UK and other European countries, the need for sustainability development is manifested through policies or standards like EIA or ISO 4001 and environment-friendly practices that are measured through refined environment management tools and sustainability assessment programs or tools. During my critical evaluation of the case study relative to the EIA project, I implemented the critical aspects of assessing the development project with special emphasis on evacuating sustainability and analyzing the EIA of the project.
References to External Sources
He, X., and Zhang, K. (2011). Multidisciplinary approaches to new pathways to sustainable development. Environment and development
Planning and Project Management, Chuthamat's Space 2015. Available from: <http://chuthamatc.blogspot.com/2011/10/objective-16-planning-and-project.html/>.Accessed [23 November 2015].
Rebecca Johansson, 2011, Evaluation of experiences from using CEEQUAL in infrastructure projects - A case study of the Crossrail programme and the Olympic Park.
Grace K C Ding, 2007, Sustainable Construction – The Role of Environmental Assessment Tools, 2007, Australia.
References to Your Supplementary Evidence
A critical analysis of the EIA case study “The Forth Replacement Crossing” is included in the Supplementary Evidence (EIA Project_IDL_H00142885_Ahmed Heiba.docx)
Summary of Achievement
As depicted from my supplementary evidence cited above, I fully understand and comprehend the vital need to periodically assess and evaluate building sustainability to promote a safer and greener global environment. The case study of the EIA project I undertook further helped me realize the significance of strategic environmental assessments and their role in achieving sustainability objectives.
Reflection on Progress
I believe I have gained a deeper understanding of the importance of sustainability measurement tools and the need for environmental impact assessments to promote greener sites. I plan to undertake a case study for a civil engineering project and critically evaluate the sustainability factor to refine my experience further. The research and study I undertook to achieve this objective have broadened my understanding and knowledge regarding the need for implementing environment-friendly practices in the various dimensions of the community across the globe. The practical initiative on my part to study and evaluate the EIA project further enabled me to acquire knowledge regarding how the policies and standards implemented in practice can ensure sustainable development.
13- Critical Analysis of the Details of At Least One Environmental Impact Statement
Conducting a critical analysis of the details within an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is a vital step in evaluating the potential environmental consequences of a proposed project. An EIS is a comprehensive document that outlines the project's purpose, its alternatives, and the expected impacts on the environment.
Evidence
The Critical analysis of the case study “The Fourth Replacement Crossing” demonstrates that the most fundamental environmental and sustainable aspects can be successfully considered in an environmental impact assessment (EIA). At this point, it was also important to note that EIA is an essential requirement of the large-scale project under the UK legislation and the Scottish parliament. For this particular case study, appropriate assessments were conducted, reports were generated for the sites, and a summary in the form of an environmental statement was presented. The work completed on this EIA identified the key issues, including the adverse and beneficial aspects of the project on the environment.
In response to this assessment, the vicinity area was inspected to identify the constraints of the environment, potential impacts, and measures to be incorporated into the scheme to avoid any adverse impacts. An investigation of the residual effects of the scheme was undertaken. The results obtained from this assessment were then compared with the baseline conditions, and the FRC proposals were incorporated with outcomes. This assessment impacted and addressed various concerns, including land use, Geology, Contaminated Land and Groundwater, Freshwater Ecology, Estuarine Ecology, Landscape, Visual, Cultural Heritage, Air Quality during Scheme Operation, Noise and Vibration during Scheme Operation, Pedestrians, Cyclists, Equestrians and Community Effects, Disruption due to Construction and Policies and Plans according to the Forth Replacement Crossing, DMRB Stage 3 Environmental Statement, Non-Technical Summary of the year 2009.
This case study highlights the larger concerns of the built environment regarding environmental impact and how these conflicts and issues are addressed through the implementation of principles and planning systems, contracts and environmental management systems. Another case study is the Stone Bridge Hillside Hub crowns study, which shows 14 years of regeneration on the stone bridge through the provision of mixed-tenure residential blocks (chauthamat, 2015). Since the organization has utilized best practices during the construction and design of the apartments, each building block achieved an Eci-homes rating of 'very good'. Their primary care centre achieved an 'excellent' rating with the NEAT (NHS Environmental Assessment Tool). This reflects how a construction design can achieve a higher sustainability rating by implementing an environmental assessment. Other case studies also reflect how project owners balance the three core elements significant to sustainability promotion.
References to External Sources
Jacobs Arup (2009a) Sustainability Appraisal and Carbon Management Report November 2009.
Jacobs Arup (2009b) Forth Replacement Crossing: DMRB Stage 3 Environmental Statement, November 2009.
Jacobs Arup (2010) Code of Construction Practice, Revision 5, December 2010.
Scottish Executive (2005) Choosing our future: Scotland’s Sustainable Development Strategy.
Transform Scotland Trust (2008) Towards a Healthier Economy, 8th December 2008.
The Scottish Parliament (2010) Stage 1 Report on the Forth Crossing Bill, May 2010.
Transform Scotland (2010) SP Finance Committee - preventative spend inquiry evidence.
Transport Scotland (2014), A Long-Term Vision For Active Travel In Scotland (2030).
References to Your Supplementary Evidence
EIA Project_IDL_H00142885_Ahmed Heiba.docx
Summary of Achievement
The report in the Supplementary evidence shows that I have improved my experience in analyzing and evaluating an EIA regarding various issues and conflicts.
I have reviewed the project’s EIA, and although I have no doubt how important the project is, I have found downsides in a few areas that need reconsidering. I still have a lot to learn and practice, but this helped me update my knowledge and ability. The research on this particular objective enabled me to understand the various issues and conflicts organizations face in achieving high sustainability ratings and how using assessment schemes and measurement tools can facilitate addressing such concerns. During my evaluation of the EIA project- “The Forth Replacement Crossing”, I particularly assessed the project's EIA and related aspects by critically evaluating their importance in elevating the sustainability feasibility and ensuring further refinement that would have a positive environmental impact. This is further elaborated in my supplementary evidence.
Reflection on Progress
I still have much to do to enhance my ability to critique an EIA. There are areas which I’m still not very familiar with, such as geological and ecological aspects. Still, I intend to read about these areas to refine my understanding in these areas. The analysis of case studies has accentuated and broadened my understanding of sustainability concerns amongst public and private building construction projects and how it is important to implement assessment tools and conduct environment feasibility schemes to rate the construction initiatives regarding their influential environmental consequences. I believe I can further refine my knowledge by studying case studies explaining how other organizations are addressing such concerns and what practices they can implement to increase the sustainability ratings further.
14- Thorough Understanding of CEEQUAL Analysis Methods, Including Initial and Potential Scores, Detailed Evidence in Spreadsheet, Appropriate Scoping
Having a thorough understanding of CEEQUAL analysis methods is essential for professionals involved in infrastructure and construction projects. CEEQUAL, a sustainability assessment scheme, allows for the comprehensive evaluation of civil engineering and infrastructure projects. This understanding encompasses knowledge of the initial and potential scores, which provide a baseline and a target for assessing sustainability performance. A detailed evidence spreadsheet is crucial for documenting the project's sustainability achievements and aligning them with CEEQUAL criteria.
Evidence
The realization of ensuring sustainability in various construction endeavours and development projects has led to society and public institutes giving considerable attention to implementing environment-friendly practices to play their part in addressing global concerns relative to the environmental impact of human activities. From a design perspective, the execution of the built environment project must be encompassed with best practices that conform to sustainable development standards and policies. The project owner is primarily responsible for ensuring that these standards are maintained and that the design, execution, operations and maintenance of the building project reflect efforts to ensure sustainability. The public and private building construction projects need to ensure that the environmental impact relative to waste production and pollutants emission is minimized and the processes related to the operations reflect environment-friendly practices (Chauthamat, 2015).
Assessment of the sustainability feasibility of development projects is significant to ensure conformity to defined sustainable development criteria. To further understand the CEEQUAL tool more appropriately, I undertook the case study of the A470 project. I analyzed the feasibility and environmental criteria using this tool, including analytic techniques like initial and potential scoring relative to various environmental impact categories and the project's score comparison with defined criteria.
CEEQUAL analysis of the case study “A470 Lledr Valley Improvement”, including in the Supplementary Evidence, was thoroughly reviewed.
(CEEQUAL_PreAssessment_WPA_Int_Scoresheet_Adapted_by_HWU_IDL_H00142885_Ahmed Heiba.xlsx)
References to External Sources
Arup, 2005, The Arup Journal Mar 2005.
The City of Cardiff Council, A470 - Transport and Accessibility Improvements - In consultation Report
The City of Cardiff Council, A470 - Transport and Accessibility Improvements - Consultation Closed
The City of Cardiff Council, A470 - Transport and Accessibility Improvements - Post Consultation Report
International Road Federation (IRF), 2013, Moving Towards Green Road Infrastructure - Case Studies and Lessons Learned
Planning and Project Management, Chuthamat's Space 2015. Available from: <http://chuthamatc.blogspot.com/2011/10/objective-16-planning-and-project.html/>.Accessed [23 November 2015].
Rebecca Johansson, 2011, Evaluation of experiences from using CEEQUAL in infrastructure projects - A case study of the Crossrail programme and the Olympic Park.
References to Your Supplementary Evidence
(CEEQUAL_PreAssessment_WPA_Int_Scoresheet_Adapted_by_HWU_IDL_H00142885_Ahmed Heiba.xlsx)
Comments and Evaluation of CEEQUAL_IDL_H00142885_Ahmed Heiba
Summary of Achievement
The spreadsheet in the Supplementary evidence shows my understanding of the CEEQUAL analysis and scoring system, including how it works. I determined what evidence still needs to be provided to claim the score.
Reflection on Progress
I understand there is still a lot to do to be capable enough to be an assessor and verifier, so I plan to do this through additional training and experience. The research and evaluation of different indicator sets helped me learn about selecting proper indicators to facilitate accurate measurement of project sustainability. The research on the pros and cons strengthened my understanding of indicator types' various limitations and strengths and how they contributed to measurement systems. As my supplementary evidence suggests, my CEEQUAL assessment helped me greatly in measuring sustainability using a set of indicators while realizing their potential strengths and weaknesses. The assessment has broadened my knowledge and expertise regarding using an effective indicator set and how it can be further refined to enhance accurate measurement.
15- A Detailed Understanding of a Case Study Through a CEEQUAL Analysis with Critical Reflections on How the Case Study Could Be More Sustainable
Gaining a detailed understanding of a case study through a CEEQUAL analysis is a valuable exercise for evaluating the sustainability of civil engineering and infrastructure projects. CEEQUAL provides a structured framework to assess various aspects of a project, including environmental, social, and economic considerations.
Evidence
The core elements that directly impact sustainability are people, economy and the environment, and the idea is to achieve a harmonious balance between these critical aspects as they formulate the essence of sustainable development. Achieving the optimal balance between these variables would positively influence output variables like society, earth and profitability. When measuring sustainability for a project, It is important that the balance of these elements be truly assessed and further recommendations for improvements be defined using a sophisticated measurement tool. For this purpose, an optimum indicator set has to be defined, including using a refined tool that allows measuring such metrics to predict desired results accurately.
Using this tool, the environmental aspects of the civil engineering project A470 were analyzed, and further improvements were highlighted based on the initial and potential scoring. An assessment tool should be able to highlight and measure all necessary aspects of sustainability, and by using the CEEQUAL tool, I was able to evaluate most of the required aspects to depict the feasibility of the development endeavour accurately. Areas that were measured for the specific project using CEEQUAL include categories like project environmental management, land use, landscape, biodiversity and ecology, archaeological and cultural heritage, use of materials, water use, energy, waste, transport, a nuisance to neighbours and community issues. Results are highlighted in the table below through section percentage scores.
CEEQUAL analysis of case study “A470 Lledr Valley Improvement” was completed
(CEEQUAL_PreAssessment_WPA_Int_Scoresheet_Adapted_by_HWU_IDL_H00142885_Ahmed Heiba.xlsx) and (Comments and Evaluation of CEEQUAL_IDL_H00142885_Ahmed Heiba).
Figure 1: Section Percentage Scores for A470 Project using CEEQUAL.
(processed by the author)
References to External Sources
Arup, 2005, The Arup Journal Mar 2005.
The City of Cardiff Council, A470 - Transport and Accessibility Improvements - In consultation Report
The City of Cardiff Council, A470 - Transport and Accessibility Improvements - Consultation Closed
The City of Cardiff Council, A470 - Transport and Accessibility Improvements - Post Consultation Report
International Road Federation (IRF), 2013, Moving Towards Green Road Infrastructure - Case Studies and Lessons Learned
References to Your Supplementary Evidence
(CEEQUAL_PreAssessment_WPA_Int_Scoresheet_Adapted_by_HWU_IDL_H00142885_Ahmed Heiba.xlsx)
Comments and Evaluation of CEEQUAL_IDL_H00142885_Ahmed Heiba
Summary of Achievement
The evaluation summary in the Supplementary evidence shows my understanding of the A470 case study and how it achieved a high environmental and social performance through the CEEQUAL scheme. I also learned how to evaluate the project's sustainability and suggested improving the score.
Reflection on Progress
Through this practical indication of understanding the CEEQUAL analysis and measurement tool, I have gained significant knowledge and experience in critically evaluating the feasibility and sustainability of civil engineering projects. I need to undertake such critical evaluations in future to enhance my prowess further.
16- Critical Reflections on How the CEEQUAL Tool Could Be Improved Beyond the Current Available Options
Critical reflections on how the CEEQUAL tool could be enhanced beyond its current options are essential for the continuous evolution of sustainability assessment in civil engineering and infrastructure projects. While CEEQUAL is a valuable framework, there is always room for improvement.
Evidence
CEEQUAL is a British assessment and award scheme to enhance and promote sustainability in civil engineering (Johansson, 2011). The scheme is useful as it assesses almost all types of civil engineering projects, unlike other schemes. However, CEEQUAL, as compared with business-as-usual, we believe, needs to be more challenging as it is too easy to get high scores. Also, the scheme does not assess all aspects of sustainability; hence, there is a need for a more refined measurement of a project’s environmental impact and criteria to address the health and safety aspects of a project. The scheme currently doesn't address how much CO2 emission the project may cause. If this feature is incorporated, then it would be more useful and would provide more balance to the project’s sustainability performance.
References to External Sources
Rebecca Johansson, 2011, Evaluation of experiences from using CEEQUAL in infrastructure projects - A case study of the Crossrail programme and the Olympic Park.
References to Your Supplementary Evidence
(CEEQUAL_PreAssessment_WPA_Int_Scoresheet_Adapted_by_HWU_IDL_H00142885_Ahmed Heiba.xlsx)
Comments and Evaluation of CEEQUAL_IDL_H00142885_Ahmed Heiba
EIA Project_IDL_H00142885_Ahmed Heiba.docx
Summary of Achievement
I have improved my understanding of the fact that The CEEQUAL scheme is, in fact, a very useful tool as it assesses all types of civil engineering projects, which other schemes do not, but as expected, the scheme has downsides similar to other schemes, which I have covered in my Supplementary Evidence.
The explanation and supplementary evidence above show that I have gained considerable understanding and practical experience in evaluating and assessing design and planning considerations for measuring sustainable development. The CEEQUAL assessment helped me understand the significance of responsibilities in the planning, designing and operating of a construction project and how they specifically ensure environment-friendly practices. To further refine my skills and prowess regarding professional responsibilities as a construction engineer or consultant, I need to undertake further studies and research that would prove fruitful.
Reflection on Progress
I have gained an insight into the core strengths and weaknesses of the CEEQUAL measurement and analysis tool. This particular analysis would benefit me in my future endeavours as a civil engineer. My recommendations on refinement to this tool might prove fruitful in future enhancements to this analysis model, which will contribute significantly to sustainability objectives.
To evaluate progress in the sustainability arena, the measurement indicator sets, and types must be finalized in CEEQUAL measurement, as the kind of indicator set and the measurement criteria are considerably significant when assessing building feasibility. There are various tools available, and the inadequacies and limitations can greatly result in the sustainability ratings not being effective. An integrated assessment CEEQUAL system should be developed, which uses an effective indicator set and predicts accurate feasibility, which can also be used to measure the performance of every component or element in the construction project. Benchmarks and performance criteria can then be established once the overall performance has been measured. An integrated tool would be able to measure all three components of sustainable development, including people, environment and the economy. The indicator possesses the attributes of reliability, relevance, measurability, understandably transparent and repeatability.
Get 3+ Free Dissertation Topics within 24 hours?
