The following literature tends to highlight some key innovation management models practised by businesses. Innovation is defined as new ideas, new imaginations, or creative thoughts that can be applied to a system or organization in the form of a method or technique, according to Loukis, Charalabidis, and Androutsopoulou (2017). On contrary, innovation management is referred to as a business discipline to ensure the repeatable and sustainable processes of innovation within the organisation. Open innovation is a model which assumes that organizations should use external and internal ideas for marketing to make advancements in their business (Martín-de Castro, 2015). Open innovation introduced the notion that organizations can use knowledge from various sources to enhance innovation and deliver value to customers (Martín-de Castro, 2015). Open Innovation was not designed only for private organizations. The model can be adopted by other innovative entities, non-profit organizations, and universities. In the business innovation model, the organizations are responsible for rethinking their current business to generate revenue streams. For this purpose, organizations must improve their existing business model to increase the value of their business.
Martín-de Castro (2015) further stated that two innovation management models are used for this report. The first theory used for this report is the Open Innovation theory. Open Innovation is defined as purposeful outflows and inflows of knowledge to accelerate internal innovation while expanding markets for the use of innovation externally.
Open innovation defines the process through which organizations utilize and access external innovation. Open Innovation model processes can combine external and internal ideas into systems and architectures. According to Martín-de Castro (2015), open innovation model processes employ business models for defining the requirements for systems and architectures.
To implement this innovation management model during innovation, organizations should focus on the following principles of the open innovation model:
Martín-de Castro (2015) mentioned in the study that there are several benefits for organizations that adopt the Open innovation model for their businesses:
Open innovation can help organizations increase the level of their performance. In this way, TerraCycle can generate revenues and work on the different innovation processes. Schuurman (2015) argued that integrating the feedback from the partner firms during the innovative process can enable TerraCycle to target their development efforts to improve the quality of their services and products (Brant and Lohse, 2014).
Obtaining the technology and skills from external sources is beneficial for organizations. To gain these benefits, TerraCycle needs to create inputs and reduce the risks and costs linked with developing a product (Brant and Lohse, 2014).
As the market conditions are changing rapidly, Open Innovation will benefit TerraCycle as it permits the organization to become flexible and adapt the knowledge based on shifting commercial needs (Brant and Lohse, 2014).
This innovation management model will enable TerraCycle to spread its business model and advance its technology (Brant and Lohse, 2014). TerraCycle can monetize its development investments through Open innovation. Through Open Innovation, TerraCycle organization can employ its ideas in the market. Open innovation will allow TerraCycle to profit from its partners' assets, including investor relationships and reputations (Brant and Lohse, 2014). New opportunities open when trust is developed between partners, which may further deepen the collaboration and sharing between TerraCycle and other organizations.
Moreover, Schuurman (2015) added that open innovation produces benefits that are helpful for innovation and technological advancement. Furthermore, Open innovation divides labour and specialization in development. This way, opportunities are provided for the TerraCycle organization to commercialize new solutions.
According to Schuurman (2015), the open innovation model will impose a few limitations on TerraCycle, as the model advocates the use of organizational form that has further restrictions in complex (problem-solving) environments such as innovation. To implement an open innovation model, TerraCycle should know that as the problems become more complex, the limitations of hierarchy (authority-based) are reached quickly, and another hierarchy (consensus-based) is introduced.
The second theory TerraCycle will be using is the Business model innovation. It defines innovation processes based on how the organizations deliver and create value, opposing the concept of creating new services and products (Santoro et al., 2018). Business model innovation helps to develop the idea that supports an organization's financial viability, including the processes and mission to make the concept fruitful for the organization.
The business model innovation processes have been intact with sound business principles. These business principles have been outlined with the help of core business principles:
The organization must focus on these four features to make innovation in its business model.
Rethinking the current business strategies and modifying them is another part of the innovation management model. For applying the business model innovation, organizations should consider the following processes:
The organization must identify the market and its offerings, how the organisation's value proposition was created, and how the revenue was generated (Kylliäinen, 2020). The organization can design a business model canvas for this process.
Innovation is essential for the advancement of business. For this purpose, the organization must create ideas that propose a challenge in the market and ensure what the current market demands. Out-of-the-box ideas are required to innovate the business of the organization. When the organization struggles with advancement in its business, it must confront its business model for innovation (Kylliäinen, 2020).
The organizations must ensure that the business model is kept consistent with the organisation's long-term vision.
The organization must make iterations in the business model based on the findings. The organization must test the business model and its success and failure factors.
Dissertation Proposal Lays Down the Outline of Your Final Dissertation
Get a Dissertation Proposal that matches your requirements, which includes the topic title, research aim and objective, research questions, research gap, literature review, methodology and list of reference papers.
The Dissertation Proposal will be foundation of your final dissertation. It is very important to get this done perfectly to avoid any problems!
The most significant advantage of innovation in the business model is that it will contribute to making TerraCycle sustainable and can cope with the shifts in market conditions. Most organisations close their business doors because they cannot manage their financial situation. Therefore, a business model innovation will be beneficial for TerraCycle to make a profit each month.
The investors are well informed of the fact of business failures. Investors want to have explicit knowledge of TerraCycle's plans for profitability. A proper business model and profit statement will greatly benefit TerraCycle over the competitors in the market, and the investors will provide profitable investment (Ingram, 2020).
An innovative business model will provide benefits and profit to TerraCycle consistently. A solid business model will help build cash reserves in TerraCycle to invest in equipment, development efforts, and property (Ingram, 2020). Moreover, business model innovations yield higher revenues than process and product innovations. According to Geissdoerfer, Vladimirova, and Evans (2018), sustainable business models provide the benefit of mitigating higher risk and resilience. The innovation management model for modifying business models is essential as it focuses on stakeholder value and benefits rather than customer benefit (Geissdoerfer, Vladimirova, and Evans, 2018).
Leading consumer product companies, cities, facilities, and retailers are partnered with TerraCycle to reprocess packages and products, from cigarette butts to dirty diapers that would end up burnt or landfilled otherwise. TerraCycle is working with top product companies to integrate products that are difficult to recycle, such as ocean plastic. It is one of the fastest-developing companies and is the world’s leading company in using and collecting non-recyclable waste (Li, 2015). With the help of innovation management models, TerraCycle has implemented a business model canvas to advance its business in the market, as shown in the table.
TerraCycle started with eco-friendly fertilizer, which is produced from waste and worms. It is directed towards eliminating waste and saving resources, impacting worldwide environmental concerns. In twelve years, it aimed at making waste into new use again. Reusing cigarette butts and many other recycles incredibly far beyond one imagination. These are further recycled into plastic pellets to produce industrial goods. Due to low subsidies and donations from the government, TerraCycle has started social entrepreneurship to instrument the social mission of telling the world about the value of environmental protection. Collectors are paid in cash, and the financing problem is solved. In the meantime, the company’s value and social impact are improved through its products in the market (Li, 2014). Over twelve years, TerraCycle has developed over 200 products, and these products are licensed to the manufacturers.
TerraCycle has involved in the manufacture of fertilizers that Vermicompost makes. Vermicompost is formed when organic waste is fed to worms. The worms are liquefied into compost tea, and this is done by mixing the compost tea with warm water and air in vats. In 2007, TerraCycle expanded its production into upcycling and started to develop its products from waste materials. TerraCycle was unable to upcycle the plastic packaging waste. These wastes were then recycled into raw materials used in plastic products. TerraCycle is a recycling company that introduced different recycling programs that enabled individuals to collect waste items. In 2019, TerraCycle revealed a loop that provides a packaging platform for companies having consumer packaged goods. This system offers shipping facilities through UPS and ships personal care products, food materials, and cleaning products in reusable containers. These products are distributed from these reusable containers.
The application of the open innovation model in TerraCycle depends on external sources, as it is the principle of the open innovation model to gain knowledge and expertise from external sources/individuals. This is critical to the process of innovation in any organization. The open innovation model will aim to improve the abilities of TerraCycle to provide new ideas for solutions and products through external ideas given by partners and consumers to accomplish success in the market. TerraCycle applies the open innovation model to build external strength through recycling or upcycling programs. The company aims to collaborate with leading consumer product companies and retailers to find various solutions. These programs will provide product support for entrepreneurs, which will help the entrepreneurs to build new services and products. According to Mortara et al. (2009), TerraCycle will have to focus on building independent open innovation teams that will work within the company. This will be the best choice to implement open innovation.
Moreover, TerraCycle will need the skills to implement open innovation because a lack of appropriate skills will be an obstacle to the implementation of open innovation (Mortara et al., 2009). TerraCycle may adopt this model on stages between entrepreneurs and teams or maybe on stages between the company and consumers. The open innovation model will involve the consumers in the production process, and TerraCycle will use the suggestions given by external ideas/partners, and these ideas can be processed to develop new products. According to Lee, Park, Yoon, and Park (2010), it is suggested that more focus should be given to the latter part of the traditional open innovation model so that the model is applied within TerraCycle. The open innovation model is used for companies that are working with other firms which are specialized in marketing, which had an active collaboration and contribution in the innovation process, as is the case with TerraCycle, which is partnered with leading consumer product companies and retailers.
According to Cosyns and Cornfield (2018), waste has no value, and if left untreated, it offers negative value to society and the environment. TerraCycle will be applying the business model innovation for waste upcycling and recycling. There are three mechanisms for achieving sustainable business model innovation to create value from waste that involves the reduction of waste, for example, reverting the waste to the production stream for recycling and creating value from waste in the form of upcycling (Cosyns and Cornfield, 2018). The waste reduction will improve based on the current business model, but TerraCycle must apply business model innovation to create value from the waste.
TerraCycle offers recycling programs which various brand retailers and manufacturers fund to the world and other organizations to help them collect and recycle the hard to recycle waste in terms of future perspective. Start the collection in-home or anywhere and send the waste to be recycled by TerraCycle. Rewards can be earned by our favourite non-profit. After thorough planning and rigorous testing, TerraCycle has revealed Loop, which they believe would be revolutionary in packaging and provide pathways for more development in the packaging industry. The new shopping system should provide various products in refillable and reusable packaging. Moreover, many products viewed as unproductive to processes, such as pens, razor blades, and diapers, will be recycled (TerraCycle, 2020).
Every operation of TerraCycle provided the idea of the circular economy. The recycling course would be highly sustainable and efficient. Otherwise, it will affect TerraCycle’s brand and reputation. The company majorly works on its collection programs to help other manufacturing companies. The program extension's goal would be to reassure that the products made from recycled materials are recyclable and the tack back for the system exists. It will not take substantial resources to create a system like this because it could use the already existing and functioning point collection (Bukowski and Rok, 2019). The open innovation model will play a significant role in developed economies in the next decade. Emerging technological trends will fuel innovation, and sustainable development goals will join them.
Rapid growth in the economy of China poses challenges and opportunities in implementing the open innovation model. Consumers of middle income will increase, and that will cause a tremendous increase in growth all over the world. The innovation will evolve itself. Therefore, there must be a policy prepared to adjust. The rise of crowdfunding will create financial support for start-up projects. Consistent increases in the innovation ecosystem will have vital implications for antitrust regulation. According to Bogers, Chesbrough, and Moedas (2018), consumers will need anti-trust protection, but corporations among the competitors will be pro-social in some contexts of open innovation.
An innovative business model and operation method are provided by TerraCycle, which is a typical social enterprise and a source of inspiration for many others. The social entrepreneurship model will be an example for people to cope with the urgent challenges of social pressure. To maintain a balance between social morals and economic profits, proper operations are necessary for a social enterprise to achieve its social mission. Consequently, social enterprises will make paths to create new business models (Li,2014). Identifying and addressing the innovatory abilities according to the context of open innovation is crucial as shifting from closed to open innovation poses challenges. According to Lee et al. (2010), small and medium-sized organizations are good at innovation but lack potential resources. That’s why it is suggested that they collaborate with other firms at the commercialisation stage to boost open innovation.
Review the following:
Bogers, M., Chesbrough, H. and Moedas, C., 2018. Open innovation: research, practices, and policies. California management review, 60(2), pp.5-16.
Brant, J. and Lohse, S., 2014. The open innovation model. ICC (International Chamber of Commerce) Innovation and Intellectual Property Research Paper, (2).
Bukowski, H. and Rok, B. (2019). [Online] R2piproject.eu. Available at: http://www.r2piproject.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/TerraCycle-Case-Study.pdf [Accessed 29 Feb. 2020].
Cosyns, C. and Cornfield, A., 2018. Business Model Innovation for Upcycling: Uncovering Conditions and Their Interactions Facilitating and Hindering a Sustainable Business Model Transformation.
Geissdoerfer, M., Vladimirova, D., Van Fossen, K. and Evans, S., 2018. Product, service, and business model innovation: A discussion. Procedia Manufacturing, 21, pp.165-172.
Ingram, D. (2020). The Advantages of a Business Model. [Online] Smallbusiness.chron.com. Available at: https://smallbusiness.chron.com/advantages-business-model-3873.html [Accessed 3 Mar. 2020].
Kylliäinen, J. (2020). Key Innovation Management Models and Theories. [Online] Viima.com. Available at: https://www.viima.com/blog/innovation-management-models#business-model-innovation [Accessed 3 Mar. 2020].
Lee, S., Park, G., Yoon, B. and Park, J., 2010. Open innovation in SMEs—an intermediated network model. Research Policy, 39(2), pp.290-300.
Li, Y., 2014, August. Business model innovation of social entrepreneurship firm: A case study of TerraCycle. In 2014 International Conference on Management Science & Engineering 21th Annual Conference Proceedings (pp. 507-514). IEEE.
Loukis, E., Charalabidis, Y. and Androutsopoulou, A., 2017. Promoting open innovation in the public sector through social media monitoring. Government information quarterly, 34(1), pp.99-109.
Martín-de Castro, G., 2015. Knowledge management and innovation in knowledge-based and high-tech industrial markets: The role of openness and absorptive capacity. Industrial marketing management, 47, pp.143-146.
Mortara, L., Napp, J.J., Slacik, I. and Minshall, T., 2009. How to implement open innovation: Lessons from studying large multinational companies. University of Cambridge Institute for Manufacturing.
Naqshbandi, M.M., Kaur, S. and Ma, P., 2015. What organizational culture types enable and retard open innovation? Quality & Quantity, 49(5), pp.2123-2144.
Open Innovation - Keynotes, Masterclasses & Games. (2020). Open Innovation. [Online] Available at: https://www.openinnovation.eu/open-innovation/ [Accessed 2 Mar. 2020].
Santoro, G., Vrontis, D., Thrassou, A. and Dezi, L., 2018. The Internet of Things: Building a knowledge management system for open innovation and knowledge management capacity. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136, pp.347-354.
Schuurman, D., 2015. Bridging the gap between Open and User Innovation?: exploring the value of Living Labs as a means to structure user contribution and manage distributed innovation (Doctoral dissertation, Ghent University).
TerraCycle. (2020). [Online] Available at: https://www.TerraCycle.com/en-US/ [Accessed 29 Feb. 2020].