How to Write a Dissertation Conclusion
August 1, 2022
Developing a methodology is perhaps the most difficult and time-consuming part of conducting research. A methodology provides insight into the broad philosophical perspectives behind the methods you choose to employ in your study. It is important to state clearly whether you will collect data qualitatively, quantitatively, or using both.
In order to justify your preferred method, you will be required to provide justifications. A dissertation methodology article can help you figure out exactly how to write it or how to structure it.
The Importance of Research Methodology
The methods section of your paper is an opportunity for you to explain how and why you conducted your research. Your research must also be replicateable and rigorously conducted.
You can also refer your readers to this section if they have any questions or critiques in other sections. It gives your research legitimacy and situates it within your field.
Research methodologies provide the following benefits:
- Replication of the research by other researchers is possible with enough information.
- Methodology can be used by researchers to explain their approach when they receive criticism.
- Researchers can use it as a guide during their research to make sure that they are following a specific plan.
- It helps researchers select the right methods based on their objectives through the methodology design process.
- By defining the research objectives from the start, researchers can make sure they are on track.
What Does a Research Methodology Include?
It is important to be aware of the typical contents of methodology chapters when learning how to write one. In most cases, it provides a guideline for how to approach your research and should explain why this approach was chosen to collect data and analyze it.
Dissertations must explain the choices made during the research process, regardless of topic or subject area. Among the contents of methodology are the research design, the philosophical approach, the techniques for data collection, the limitations, ethical issues, and the methods to analyze the data.
Most university libraries have books that describe the most common methods of analysis, which you can find in their collections. When you read them, you can determine which philosophy you are using or which technique is appropriate for your research. Your study's limitations will be clarified and how to overcome them will be explained.
Putting it simply. The following should be included:
- How you conducted your research
- Data collection and analysis
- Materials or tools you used during your research
- The reasons behind your choice of methods
How to Structure your Research Methodology?
In the methodology chapter, it is important to note that it will differ according to the field of research (for example, engineering vs chemistry) and the university. If possible, review past dissertations and theses from your institution for clarity and, if necessary, check the guidelines provided by your institution. Our objective here is to provide a generic framework for a methodology chapter commonly seen in the sciences, especially in social sciences (e.g. psychology).
A rough outline is always a good idea before you start writing, so you know where you are going. Make sure you know where your writing will go before you begin. A disjointed, poorly flowing narrative is likely to result if you do so. Therefore, you will have to spend a lot of time rewriting.
Step 1: Describe your methodological approach
The methodology chapter should have a brief introduction, just like all other chapters in your dissertation or thesis. You should remind your readers in this introduction what your study aims to achieve, especially its focus. Research aims, objectives, and questions should inform the design of your research, as we have discussed numerous times on this blog. In this way, your design and methodology will be more clearly understood by the reader (and you! ).
This section also discusses the chapter's structure. Readers will be able to follow along with this and get a sense of what is to come.
Step 2: Describe the method you will use to collect your data
You should share full details about your data collection methods once you have introduced your methodological approach.
Quantitative methods
The quantitative research methods described in your study must be sufficiently detailed for another researcher to replicate them.
Your operationalization and measurement methods should be outlined here. In addition to your sampling method or inclusion/exclusion criteria, describe how you gathered your data and what tools, procedures, and materials you used.
Qualitative methods
Qualitative research involves more subjective and flexible methods. Because of this, it's essential to explain your methodology choices clearly.
You will need to describe the research process (e.g., were you an active participant, or a passive observer? ), the criteria you used to select your data, and the context in which the research took place.
Mixed methods
Qualitative and quantitative approaches are combined in mixed methods research. Mixed methods are an excellent option if a standalone quantitative or qualitative study does not address your research question adequately.
Keep in mind that data collection is only one part of mixed methods research. Instead, it involves carefully considering and integrating both types of data into robust and solid conclusions.
Due to the difficulty of executing mixed methods successfully, they are less common than standalone analyses. It is especially important to robustly justify your methods if you decide to pursue mixed methods.
Step 3: Explain how you will analyze the data
The last major design choice is how you will analyze the data. What will you do with the data once you have collected it? Leave no room for interpretation in your analysis methods and/or techniques. Each choice you make in this chapter must also be justified.
It will depend on what kind of study you are conducting (e.g., qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods) and exactly what you discuss here. Thematic analysis, content analysis, and discourse analysis are common methods of analyzing qualitative studies. Descriptive statistics are the most commonly used statistical techniques for quantitative studies, and inferential statistics (like correlations and regressions) are often used as well.
This section should also include a discussion of how your data was prepared for analysis, as well as what software you used. In the case of quantitative data, it will often be necessary to remove duplicates or incomplete responses as part of the initial preparation process. Make sure you explain both your actions and your reasoning.
Step 4: Assess your methodological choices and justify them
It is essential that you clearly explain why you chose the methods you did in your methodology section. Particularly if you did not approach your topic in a standard manner. Describe how this approach contributes new knowledge or understanding to your objectives and why other methods were not appropriate.
No matter what, your reader should be easily convinced that you designed your methodology to be successful. Leave a discussion section after your methods to explain what the results mean, what their significance is, and how they are relevant to your research.
Types of Research Methodology
These are the common research methodology types:
A scientific study
A scientific study's methodology section must emphasize rigour and reproducibility above all else. The reader must be able to see that your methods are robust, without obvious flaws in their design or execution. A successful study requires not only the details of your equipment, lab setup, and procedure so that another researcher can replicate it, but also the ability to factor in potential distorted variables (such as false positives) and make plans for how to handle them.
Statistical models you will use to analyze your data should also be described and justified in your methodology. Any section of your methodology may be used as a starting point for another scholar's own work; they may follow your experiments but choose a different analysis methodology or vice versa!
Behavioral or social sciences studies
Methodologies used in social and behavioural sciences need to demonstrate both rigour and reproducibility, so that another researcher may reproduce your study in part or in whole. There are, however, several additional questions to address when working with human subjects.
The first thing you should do is decide what kind of analysis you will conduct: is it qualitative, quantitative, or a mix that uses qualitative data to complement quantitative data (or vice versa)? Are you going to record interviews, ask your subjects to fill out written questionnaires, or observe them as they perform some activity? Are you going to rely on documentary evidence or pre-existing data instead of conducting your own research with human subjects? What are the results and conclusions of your research? Are you able to generalize it to other cultures or locations, or is it highly specific to your research location?
Your reader must also be satisfied that you have considered all ethical issues associated with your research in addition to answering all these questions. In addition to getting the appropriate ethical approvals, it is important to recognize that some readers may find certain aspects of your study problematic or contentious. For example, you may ask subjects to recall episodes of grief and trauma. Whenever possible, address concerns head-on and emphasize the potential value of your conclusions by justifying your methods.
Humanities or arts critical dissertation
Art and humanities are just as valuable as sciences and social sciences when it comes to methodological rigour. A humanities or art dissertation is somewhat different in how it conveys rigour - and makes the audience believe it. Literature reviews are much more closely related to methodology sections in arts or humanities dissertations than in scientific or social sciences dissertations; even the most outstanding arts or humanities dissertations often combine X's and Y's theories to produce new theoretical frameworks.
A literature review and analysis can move more or less seamlessly from one another in an arts or humanities dissertation, so it can be tempting to skip over the methodology section. A critical reader may not take your entire approach into consideration if you fail to justify your selected frameworks and their relationship to the research question you are analyzing here.
Particularly where there is a fundamental disagreement between theorists, it is crucial that the methodology of your dissertation demonstrates an appreciation of cultural and historical contexts. You should justify why you have decided to incorporate aspects of each school of thought into your own work if you intend to use the work of theorists from opposite schools of thought to support your readings.
A creative arts dissertation
There are many arts programs that allow students to complete a creative rather than critical dissertation; that is, rather than submitting an extended critical project, a portfolio of artwork can be submitted. Creative projects are generally accompanied by critical essays (or introductions, or commentary) that theorize the practice.
Developing a rigorous methodology is particularly important in this context because critically engaging with your own work is notoriously difficult. In addition to demonstrating an ability to detach yourself from your own work and view it objectively, you must also demonstrate that you can look at your own creative practice as a methodology - as a means of creating work that is grounded in theory and research and can be measured against clear outcomes.
FAQs About Dissertation Research Methodology
Literature reviews and theoretical frameworks may also be included before the methodology, depending on the length and type of document.
